Andrew Tate: Women unhappy, unstable, promiscuous because of men
Originally Published July 14, 2023
Having watched Andrew Tate’s 2 ½ hour interview with Tucker Carlson on July 11, 2023, I was surprised to learn how fundamentally toxic Andrew Tate’s advice is to young men.
Tate outlined that men need to cast aside their depressions and feelings and just man-up, be strong, be stoic, and become ultra-competitive against other men in order to gain women’s approval and access to sex. He spoke about what he believes the value and measure of men should be, namely, men should earn a lot of money, drive nice cars, and have “six pack” abs. In other words for men to be more like him if they want to be considered winners. Failing to do so, according to Tate, makes men unworthy of women’s respect, the respect of society, and the respect of their children.
Tate uses logic that turns the definition of dignity and self-respect on its head.
In one example, he claimed that a 52 year old man who cannot find anyone of quality to have sex with is simply not being man enough. Tate suggests that men who cannot impress women with money and abs are lacking ambition and self-respect.
What Tate did not discuss in any detail was the women that so many hard working and self-sacrificing men end up catching (and I mean catching like one catches a venereal disease).
The world young men live in today presents them with women who are less intelligent than ever, more promiscuous than ever, more mentally ill than ever, and feel more entitled than ever—all while the power of the State rewards women’s moral degeneracy and their abuse of men.
What Andrew Tate advocates is for men to be so-called ‘real men’ and be ultra-competitive against each other by waking up earlier, working harder, and earning more than other men while growing bigger biceps and six packs to earn women’s validation. Having accomplished all that, he argues, men would have “self-respect” for women to follow their lead. Exactly how this works he doesn’t explain, nor how countless men who have amassed vast fortunes, great wisdom, power, and physical fitness still failed to succeed in relationships with modern women. Tate himself, having fathered children with differnt women and presumably following his own advice has not found a woman he would settle down with.
When Tucker Carlson asked Tate “what do you think of women?” Tate responded that 40% of the letters he got in jail were love letters from women who were attracted to his masculinity, and that most women who “haven’t lost their minds” just want to be “financially provided for and physically protected” by men. He acknowledged that women hold great power in society and control access to sex. When Tucker Carlson stated that by most metrics women have become far more unhappy since 1970, Tate replied, “How can you be happy when all the men around you are not men?”
While Tate admits women have great power and influence over men in our society, he then turns around and shoots his own logic in the foot by claiming women’s unhappiness and failures are actually the men’s fault for not being men enough. Furthermore, he claims men have been “destroyed” but holds women largely harmless for that, and claims men is the reason why women are unhappy and emotionally unstable.
Tate then proceeds to claim that women sleeping around with countless men is also men’s fault because women are merely looking for a good protector and provider who is moral enough for women to settle down with. In other words, because men are not moral enough for women, they are forced to sleep around with countless men searching for that one good man.
Tate then talked about women’s evolutionary nature to survive as justification for them sleeping with invading enemy army’s soldiers (as French women did with Nazi soldiers who killed their husbands), and how women are just more naïve, more emotional, and more likely to believe mass media propaganda. He then states that “it’s not a woman’s job to be emotionally stable”, and argued that it is up to the man to be the source of women’s emotional and mental stability as well as their happiness.
What Andrew Tate believes is that the bulk of responsibility for modern women’s toxicity and failure falls largely on men, and unless men become Übermenschen to gain women’s validation and respect, then they are losers and failures in life.
Tate’s assertions are as fundamentally flawed as they are destructive to any young man who believes them. On one hand Tate argues that women have power over society and men, and on the other he argues that it’s men’s responsibility and fault for not sacrificing themselves enough to make women happy and mentally stable. His most basic position that men need to be more competitive, more financially successful and more physically fit to be considered real men worthy of women’s respect is like saying that the only way a slave could gain respect and freedom is by being the best slave he can be to his master.
Perhaps Andrew Tate is presenting his more politically correct attacks on men just to show his critics that he is not a ‘misogynist.’ After all, trashing and blaming men for all women’s ills is always welcomed in modern society and would appease some of Tate’s critics. But the hard truth–the non-politically correct one–is that modern women are morally corrupt, promiscuous to the point of being repulsive to men, feel entitled from the moment they learn to flex their sexual power to get whatever they want, and have been given a license by society and the State to use and abuse men and boys without facing consequences.
Many modern women exhibit signs of narcissistic or borderline personality disorders, and like Andrew Tate, they too believe all their unhappiness is the fault of men who just failed to meet their delusional expectations and demands.
Most modern women in our hostile society are not worth men’s sacrifices, and they are certainly not men’s responsibility. No young man should strive to submit his self-worth and personal interests for spoiled and morally corrupt women’s approval. Nor should any young man feel responsible to make those women happy. What Andrew Tate is actually preaching is for men to be weak and submissive to women. Men, however, can only have respect and self-worth when they are centered in their own being and strong enough to reject any care for what women or society thinks or wants them to sacrifice against their own interests.
Men’s lives, happiness, and fulfillment matters. They should not be taught to sacrifice themselves to someone else as any kind of precondition. Men, going their own way, is the very definition of being strong, of having self-worth, and having self-respect. If women want a strong man, there is non-stronger than one going his own way rather than cucking himself for someone else’s approval.
© Vladek Filler